Cases 71 - 80 of 258
Shropshire v. Baca et al
as 3:2015cv00164
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, James Gregory Cox and Lisa Walsh
Plaintiff:
William Shropshire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2015cv00155
Defendant:
Romeo Aranas, Jayson Artinger, Renee Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Jamal Damon Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helfrich v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00384
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Jerry Howell, Warden Dwight Neven and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Jason Helfrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Travis et al
as 3:2015cv00130
Defendant:
E. Anderson, Lt. Brown, Bryner and others
Plaintiff:
Felton L. Matthews, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Cox et al
as 3:2015cv00115
Defendant:
James Greg Cox, Leavett and Warden Neven
Plaintiff:
Henry Frometa Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Cox et al
as 2:2015cv00221
Respondent:
James Gregory Cox, Adam Laxale and The AttorneyGeneral of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Rudolph William Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vigoa Perez v. Cox et al
as 3:2015cv00065
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Harold Mike Byrne, James Gregory Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Jose M. Vigoa Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kille v. Cox
as 2:2015cv00062
Respondent:
James Greg Cox
Petitioner:
David August Kille
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clemons v. Williams et al
as 2:2014cv02195
Plaintiff:
De'Marian A. Clemons
Defendant:
James G. Cox, N.D.O.C. and Brian Williams, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Cox et al
as 3:2014cv00667
Defendant:
James G. Cox, Day, CCS3 Cary Leavitt and others
Plaintiff:
Rashon Kalani-Kai King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
