Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Dickens et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Dickens, Roman Shankaras and Thomas Gordon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00732
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Thomas L. Carroll, Mike Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00674
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Thompson
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Richard Porter, Thomas Seacord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brathwaite v. Phelps et al
as 1:2010cv00646
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Brathwaite
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, David Pierce, Christopher Klien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paynter et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paynter, Donald Cole, Kendal Robertson and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Michael Knight, Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crist v. Phelps et al
as 1:2009cv00957
Plaintiff:
William F. Crist
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Chris Klein, James Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croft v. Revacomp, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv14268
Plaintiff:
Farron Doug Croft
Defendant:
Revacomp, Inc., Larry A. Michael, Penny B. Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
