Cases 71 - 80 of 637
Cruz-Gutierrez v. Coakley
as 1:2018cv00155
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Cruz-Gutierrez
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Haynes v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv00130
Petitioner:
Scott Lee Haynes
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tabron v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2018cv00117
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Petitioner:
Quinton L. Tabron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walkner v. Coakley
as 3:2018cv00118
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Petitioner:
Dennis G. Walkner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Knight v. Coakley
as 2:2018cv00064
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Petitioner:
Dowen Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cruz-Gutierrez v. Coakley
as 3:2018cv00104
Petitioner:
Jose Armando Cruz-Gutierrez
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crayton v. Coakley
as 2:2018cv00061
Petitioner:
Deondray Crayton
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cardenas v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2018cv00131
Petitioner:
Lues Asprella Cardenas
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Casdorph v. Entzel et al
as 2:2018cv00056
Petitioner:
Michael Jarrett Casdorph
Respondent:
F. Entzel and Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Coakley
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2018cv00096
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzalez-Hernandez
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.