Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Joshua Woolridge v. James Yate
as 09-55106
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA TODD WOOLRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES
Woolridge v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2009cv00158
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief Deputy Warden, J. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joshua Todd Woolridge v. Riverside County Sheriff
as 2:2009cv00288
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant:
Riverside County Sheriff, Bob Doyle, Bob Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Woolridge v. Riverside County Shieriff
as 5:2008cv01811
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant:
Riverside County Shieriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Woolridge v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 2:2008cv02491
Petitioner:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Joshua Todd Woolridge v. James A. Yates
as 5:2008cv01237
Petitioner:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Respondent:
James A Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woolridge v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
as 4:2008cv03304
Petitioner:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woolridge v. Gonzales
as 08-55186
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA TODD WOOLRIDGE
Respondent - Appellee:
F. GONZALES
Joshua Todd Woodridge vs. F. Gonzales
as 5:2007cv01482
Petitioner:
Joshua Todd Woodridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joshua Todd Woolridge v. San Bernardino County Deptarment of Children Services Director
as 5:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Joshua Todd Woolridge
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Deptarment of Children Services Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
