Cases 71 - 80 of 90
STILLABOWER v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2015cv00126
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY and INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
WILLIAM J. STILLABOWER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCGILL v. STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00104
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TAMMIE POPE and others
Plaintiff:
JARRETT EDWARD MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JEFFERS v. KNIGHT et al
as 2:2015cv00153
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY, STANLEY KNIGHT and BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
DERON JEFFERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. ALVEY
as 3:2015cv00065
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
ALBERT L. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur T. Balls v. Kathy Alvey
as 15-2013
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR T. BALLS
Respondent - Appellee:
KATHY ALVEY, Superintendent
REED v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2015cv00058
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY and VALERIE CRONIN
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY W. REED
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. ALVEY
as 3:2015cv00054
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
BRUCE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2015cv00053
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY and RANDY LITHERLAND
Petitioner:
ALBERT L. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 3:2015cv00051
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY, RANDY LITHERLAND and SUPERINTENDENT
Petitioner:
ALBERT L. BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. ALVEY
as 3:2015cv00035
Respondent:
KATHY ALVEY
Petitioner:
BRUCE JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
