Cases 71 - 80 of 231
RIVERS EDGE, LLC et al v. MCGREEVY et al
as 2:2016cv01816
Plaintiff:
RIVERS EDGE, LLC and OAK ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
MARK G. MCGREEVY, DANIEL B. MCGREEVY, CALDERA BIG TUPPER, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENT v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01659
Plaintiff:
MONICA KENT
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , SECANT MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AHMED v. FREDERICK et al
as 2:2016cv01273
Plaintiff:
ZULAIKHA AHMED
Defendant:
KENT J. FREDERICK, STEVEN MORLEY and EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. GUBRUD
as 5:2016cv00977
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
KENT GUBRUD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRAMLETT v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
as 2:2016cv00257
Plaintiff:
KENT BRAMLETT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Owens v. Overmeyer, et al
as 1:2015cv02243
Petitioner:
Kent Owens
Respondent:
Michael Overmeyer, Attorney General of PA and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEABERRY v. WINCHESTER GLOBAL CAPITAL, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00284
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. LEABERRY
Defendant:
WINCHESTER GLOBAL CAPITAL, LLC, WINCHESTER CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC, KENT ENGELMEIER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
GANS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv04712
Plaintiff:
GREGORY KENT GANS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. USA
as 4:2015cv01084
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodger Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. USA
as 4:2015cv01083
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rodger Kent Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
