Cases 71 - 80 of 516
Kellis v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DO NOT DOCKET ANYTHING FURTHER IN THIS CASE. SEE 7:23-CV-990-M
as 4:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Larry Kellis
Defendant:
United States of America
Evans v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02076
Petitioner:
Kejuan Evans
Respondent:
Lynne B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Asbury v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02098
Petitioner:
Terickus Jamicio Asbury
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Maldonado v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02096
Petitioner:
Allan Glymar Maldonado
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Shakur v. Kelly
as 5:2023hc02093
Petitioner:
Saliq Shakur
Respondent:
Warden L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kelly v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00286
Plaintiff:
John Kelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Franson et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023mc00005
Petitioner:
Robert Franson, John G Edgar and Scott Kelly
Defendant:
United States of America
Jones et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kelly Joaquin Jones, Est. of Laura Lynn Jones and Estate of Laura L. Jones
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Jackson National Life Insurance Company v. Jarman et al
as 5:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Jackson National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Kelly Jarman
Counter Claimant:
Amanda Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
In Re: Gardasil Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2022md03036
Plaintiff:
Jessica Raymer, Payton Bergin, Kameron Hilton and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc., Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp., Watchung Pediatrics and others
Cross Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
