Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,018
Dionicio Cicspin Torrez, Jr. v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00082
Petitioner: Dionicio Cicspin Torrez, Jr.
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edward McKenna v. USDC-SAC
as 22-70009
Not Classified By Court: In re: EDWARD PHILLIP MCKENNA, THERESA CISNEROS, Warden, P. COVELLO, Warden and others
Petitioner: EDWARD PHILLIP MCKENNA
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
(HC)Harris v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00066
Petitioner: Devante B. Harris
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dionicio Cicspin Torrez, Jr. v. Clark
as 2:2022cv00121
Petitioner: Dionicio Cicspin Torrez, Jr.
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Williams v. Ramadan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01760
Plaintiff: Antonio Luis Williams
Defendant: Ramadan, Gilmore, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Sharp, Jr. v. Ken Clark
as 21-71415
Petitioner: CALVIN LEONARD SHARP, Jr.
Respondent: KEN CLARK, Warden
Joseph McCoy v. Angel Gonzales, et al
as 21-16878
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOSEPH RAYMOND MCCOY
Defendant / Appellee: ANGEL GONZALES, C. STRONACH, K. LEMAY and others
Defendant: J. CLARK KELSO, KEN CLARK, Warden and A. ENENMOH
Darryl Burghardt v. Ken Clark
as 21-56183
Petitioner / Appellant: DARRYL BURGHARDT
Respondent / Appellee: KEN CLARK, Warden
(HC) Smith v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01589
Petitioner: Lawrence Christopher Smith
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC)Smith v. Clark We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01554
Petitioner: Lawrence Christopher Smith
Respondent: Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?