Cases 71 - 80 of 245
Ferguson v. Kroger Texas LP et al
as 4:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
Gary Ferguson
Defendant:
Kroger Texas LP, The Kroger Co. and Philip Ingram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Craddock v. The Kroger Co et al
as 3:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
THOMAS W. CRADDOCK and Thomas W Craddock
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO., KROGER TEXAS L.P., The Kroger Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Mitchell v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mitchell
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. d/b/a Kroger Store No. 138 and The Kroger Co. doing business as Kroger Store No. 138
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Summers v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 4:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
Reba Summers
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fruzia v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2022cv01052
Plaintiff:
Mary Fruzia
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nigohosian v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 4:2022cv00960
Plaintiff:
Mariam Nigohosian
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Lazo v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 4:2022cv00881
Plaintiff:
Maritza Lazo
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ortiz v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 4:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Ortiz
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Kroger Texas L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Portillo v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Marlene Portillo
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hall v. The Kroger Co et al
as 4:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Hall
Defendant:
The Kroger Co., Kroger Texas L.P., The Kroger Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
