Cases 71 - 80 of 115
Davis v. Durden et al
as 8:2019cv00610
Defendant:
Michael Nutter, Wayne M. Durden, Brian Haas and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L. Davis, P.M.A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NEIBERGER et al v. DEUTSCHE BANK AG
as 1:2018cv00254
Plaintiff:
E.D., BY AND THROUGH HER NEXTFRIEND AYLA M. DAVIS, ROBERT NEIBERGER, TERESITA R. DAVIS and others
Defendant:
DEUTSCHE BANK AG
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00091
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DAVIS et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00089
Plaintiff:
CAROL L DAVIS and MICHAEL D DAVIS
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herrera Bernal v. Davis et al
as 0:2017cv62354
Plaintiff:
Jorge Mauricio Herrera Bernal
Defendant:
Dameka L. Davis and Deppeltier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haile et al v. Langford et al
as 6:2017cv01697
Plaintiff:
John Jay Haile, Sr., C. J. Haile, John Haile, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Sgt. Langford, Sgt. Sanford, Sgt. Q. Dorm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Hauck Enterprises, LTD.
as 0:2016cv62151
Plaintiff:
Sammie L. Davis
Defendant:
Hauck Enterprises, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Protective Life Insurance Company v. Betts et al
as 8:2016cv01292
Plaintiff:
Protective Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Chad M. Betts, Jeremy W. Bowers, Elena L. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Davis v. Jones et al
as 8:2016cv01155
Petitioner:
Robert L. Davis
Respondent:
Julian Jones, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brinson v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brinson
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Michael Crews, FNU Munnerlyn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
