Cases 71 - 80 of 302
Harris v. Olmstead et al
as 3:2020cv00258
Defendant:
Russell Olmstead and Julie Lawson
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Redman et al
as 3:2020cv00196
Defendant:
William Redman, Julie Lawson and William J Redman
Plaintiff:
Joshua E Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Anthony et al
as 3:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Reginald Keith Alexander
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Joshua Anthony and Heather Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lawson et al
as 3:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Alice, Wanda Jhonson and Juile Lawson
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 4:2020cv00006
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc and Love's Travel Stops and Country Stores In
Plaintiff:
Vann Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BALE v. HAMILTON COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv00113
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., D/B/A CORIZON, LLC, MATTHEW LAWSON, EL HADJI NDLAYE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. BALE, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TYLER A. BALE, DECEASED and JAMES D. BALE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taghon v. St Joseph County Indiana et al
as 3:2020cv00024
Plaintiff:
Travis T Taghon and Travis Terrance Taghon
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Mike Fulnecky, St Joseph County Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Sterling et al
as 3:2020cv00004
Defendant:
Julie Lawson, Sterling and Leda
Plaintiff:
James Edward Harris, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zimmerman v. St Joseph County of et al
as 3:2019cv01196
Defendant:
St Joseph County of, Joyce Han and Julia Lawson
Plaintiff:
Shane Lee Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
