Cases 71 - 80 of 83
HOUSE et al v. AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv73705
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL L HOUSE, JAMES JR ALLISON and WILLIAM C. MARTIN
Defendant:
AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A W CHESTERTON CO, AIRCO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
STROMBOSKY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 2:2007cv04173
Plaintiff:
JEROME D. STROMBOSKY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MASSACHUSETTS, BOSTON F.B.I., MA STATE POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JORDAN v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63991
Plaintiff:
WILMA R JORDAN
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, INC., GENERAL INSULATION C, RILEY STOKER CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
RILEY STOKER CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CONSTANCE v. AW CHESTERTON CO et al
as 2:2007cv63890
Plaintiff:
CHARLES G CONSTANCE
Defendant:
AW CHESTERTON CO, AW CHESTERTON CO, AW CHESTERTON CO and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND INC, ANCHEM PRODUCTS INC and TURNER & NEWALL PLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DUBAY v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS et al
as 2:2007cv63947
Plaintiff:
DIANA M DUBAY
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS, PITTSBURGH CORNING CO, RAPID AMERICAN CORP and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS
ThirdParty Defendant:
EASTERN REFRACTORIES, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS COMPENSATION FUND and AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WINTERS et al v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63856
Plaintiff:
CLEOLA WINTERS and AVIS H. CANTY
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CO., AC&S, INC., FIBREBOARD CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
GARLOCK, INC., AC&S, INC. and RILEY STOKER CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, EASTERN REFRACTORIES and MANVILLE CORP. ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BOIVIN et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv63896
Plaintiff:
MAYNARD P. BOIVIN and JENNIE BOIVIN
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, CLIFTON ASSOCIATES INC, GARLOCK INC and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE COPR ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PELLEGRINO v. A W CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63974
Plaintiff:
MARY A. PELLEGRINO
Defendant:
A W CHESTERTON CO., A W CHESTERTON CO., A W CHESTERTON CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC and TURNER & NEWALL PLC
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WELCH v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv63844
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. WELCH, JR. and JOHN F. WELCH, JR.
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GRAZIOSO et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv63841
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRAZIOSO and JOSEPHINE GRAZIOSO
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, EASTERN REFRACTORIES COMPANY, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
HOPEMAN BROTHERS, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
