Cases 71 - 80 of 770
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
MITCHELL v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02412
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE MITCHELL
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SENTER et al v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD SENTER, THOMAS BROWN, JESSE ANDRE and others
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND and COLLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YOUNG v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2023cv02311
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant:
MERRICK GARLAND, MICHAEL HOROWITZ, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NAZARI v. MILGRAM et al
as 1:2023cv02226
Plaintiff:
RAS LAZARUS NAZARI and BRUCE TOWNSEND
Defendant:
ANNE MILGRAM, GEORGE S. PAPADOPOULOS and MERRICK GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
