Cases 71 - 80 of 87
Brignac v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21008
Plaintiff:
Randy Brignac
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scholle v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp21005
Plaintiff:
Louis M. Scholle
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20979
Plaintiff:
Phillip Harrison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01299
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nunley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01287
Plaintiff:
Robertdale Kelly
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scholle v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01347
Plaintiff:
Louis M. Scholle
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brignac v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01346
Plaintiff:
Randy Brignac
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrison v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01285
Plaintiff:
Phillip Harrison
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nunley v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01264
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nunley
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01263
Plaintiff:
Robertdale Kelly
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Mark Starring and Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
