Cases 71 - 80 of 690
Kirk Williams v. USDC, Sacramento
as 12-70742
:
In re: KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Petitioner:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Respondent:
USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Brinson v. Marrero et al
as 3:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
David Brinson
Defendant:
E Marrero, Pederson, McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Schrubb, Sr. v. James Tilton, et al
as 12-15249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN R. SCHRUBB, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES TILTON, Secretary, ROBERT HOREL, M. D. YOX and others
Melvin Brummett, Jr. v. Robert Sillen, et al
as 12-15235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT, Jr.
Defendant:
ROBERT SILLEN, N. GRANNIS, P. MCGUINNESS, M.D. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
S. KAUR
Jesse Shavers, Jr. v. D. Clark, et al
as 12-15230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE LEE SHAVERS, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
D. CLARK, T. ROBERTSON and N. GRANNIS
Payne v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Myron A. Payne
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, James E. Tilton, Tom Felker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freddie Fernando Wortham v. Tim Busby et al
as 5:2012cv00038
Defendant:
V Allen, R Anti, B Arenson and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Fernando Wortham
Kirk Williams v. State of California, et al
as 11-17747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK DOUGLAS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO COUNTY, LASSEN COUNTY and others
Richard Anaya v. Rosanne Campbell, et al
as 11-17688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA
Defendant - Appellee:
ROSANNE CAMPBELL, Warden, N. GRANNIS, CHRISTOPHER J. SMITH, M.D. and others
Tyrone Rogers v. G. Giurbino, et al
as 11-56961
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee:
G. J. GIURBINO, Director, Division of Adult Operation, URIBE DOMINGO, Jr., Acting Warden, N. GRANNIS, Chief Inmate Appeals Branch and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
