Cases 71 - 80 of 97
Gamboni et al v. NBTY, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00702
Plaintiff:
Horacio Gamboni and Jason Piorkowski
Defendant:
Harvey Kamil, NBTY, Inc. and Jeffrey Nagel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Kelly Reed et al v. NBTY Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00142
Defendant:
MET-RX Nutrition Inc, NBTY Inc and United States Nutrition Inc
Plaintiff:
Fadi Osmano and Kelly Reed
Juan Oliva, et al v. NBTY, Inc., et al
as 13-10314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN B. OLIVA and MIGDALIA P. OLIVA
Defendant - Appellee:
NBTY, INC., a foreign corporation, NBTY MANUFACTURING, LLC, a foreign limited liability company and REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., a Florida corporation
Padilla v. NBTY, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10211
Plaintiff:
Francisco Padilla
Defendant:
NBTY, Inc., Arthritis Research Corp. and Natures Bounty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
The Tawnsaura Group LLC v. NBTY Inc
as 8:2012cv01655
Defendant:
NBTY Inc
Plaintiff:
Tawnsaura Group LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00843
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sued In Their Individual And Official Capacities Pursuant To NYEL Section 290 Et Seq:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NBTY Inc et al v. Southwest Forest Products Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00872
Defendant:
Does, Southwest Forest Products Inc and Southwest Forest Products Transportation Inc
Plaintiff:
NBTY Acquisition LLC, NBTY Inc and NBTY Manufacturing LLC
Nafise Nina Hodjat v. The Ester C Company et al
as 2:2011cv10656
Defendant:
Ester C Company, NBTY Inc and NatureSmart LLC
Plaintiff:
Nafise Nina Hodjat
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05421
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Padilla v. NBTY, INC et al
as 1:2011cv07634
Plaintiff:
Francisco Padilla
Defendant:
NBTY, INC and Rexall Sundown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
