Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MATTHEWS et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2009cv02206
Plaintiff:
BERNARD MATTHEWS, WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER MALLOY, KEVIN T. ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, UNNAMED OFFICERS, DAVID RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
NGUYEN et al v. MARTZ GROUP et al
as 1:2009cv01219
Plaintiff:
KATHI NGUYEN and MARK STOLL
Defendant:
MARTZ GROUP, MARTZ GOLD LINE/GRAY LINE, MARTZ GOLD LINE/ GRAY LINE OF WASHINGTON DC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
NGUYEN et al v. OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING ADMINISTRATION, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00525
Plaintiff:
KATHI NGUYEN and MARK STOLL
Defendant:
OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING ADMINISTRATION, LLC, CITY SIGHTSEEING WASHINGTON DC, OPEN TOP SIGHTSEEING USA and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BHAMBHANI et al v. MADRIGAL CONDOMINIUMS, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01175
Plaintiff:
DIPKA BHAMBHANI, CRAIG HEILMAN, WIAS ISSA and others
Defendant:
MADRIGAL CONDOMINIUMS, LLC and MAYHOOD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NGUYEN v. MUKASEY et al
as 1:2008cv00541
Petitioner:
DUC NGUYEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY and HARLEY G. LAPPIN
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CAMPBELL, et al v. ISLAMIC REP/IRAN, et al
as 1:2001cv02104
Plaintiff:
MARIE CAMPBELL , SHYRL L. JOHNSON , BRIDGET A. BROOKS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
