Cases 71 - 80 of 481
YOUNGER v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
JASHAWN YOUNGER
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENNEY v. WELL PATH (MEDICAL SERVICES) et al
as 2:2022cv04452
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MCKENNEY
Defendant:
WELL PATH (MEDICAL SERVICES), THOMAS A. DEGISE and OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEY v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03024
Plaintiff:
MUHAMIN BEY
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAINES v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv04187
Plaintiff:
DORIAN GAINES
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv03140
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY J. GREEN
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARROW v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv02296
Plaintiff:
VONTRA MARROW
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRUZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00704
Plaintiff:
JOSE CRUZ
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEVAULT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DEVAULT
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, OSCAR AVILES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNIS v. AVILES et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
JOHN K. DENNIS
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES and NURSE WINT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynoso v. Aviles
as 15-2700
Petitioner:
Eusebio Reynoso
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles, in his official capacity as Warden of Hudson County Jail, Christopher Shanahan, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
