Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Robinson v. Wexford Health et al
as 1:2018cv02360
Defendant:
Holly L. Pierce, Alan Graves, Breauna Baker and others
Plaintiff:
James Robinson
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jones v. Moyer et al
as 8:2018cv02321
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran, Inmate Health Services, Laura Y Armstead and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Alvin Jones
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McDonald v. George et al
as 8:2018cv02264
Defendant:
Off. Smiley, Off. George, Off. L.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Antoine McDonald
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Conner, CO II
as 1:2018cv02005
Plaintiff:
Mr. James M. Williams
Defendant:
Ms. A. Conner, CO II
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Williams v. Pierce, NP
as 1:2018cv02004
Plaintiff:
Mr. James M Williams
Defendant:
Holly Pierce, NP
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Thornton v. CO II Cook
as 8:2017cv01940
Defendant:
CO II Cook
Plaintiff:
Edward Thornton
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Nero v. Oddo et al
as 8:2017cv01263
Petitioner:
James Nero
Respondent:
L. J. Oddo, Allenwood United States Penitentiary and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sewell v. Office of the Attorney General et al
as 8:2015cv03040
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel E. Sewell
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General and Bobby P. Shearin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Green
as 8:2015cv02827
Petitioner:
Johnny Chatman, Jr.
Respondent:
Kathleen Green and Office of the Attorney General of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brader v. Gelsinger et al
as 8:2015cv02802
Plaintiff:
John E Brader, Sr.
Defendant:
Denise Gelsinger, B. Butler and Office of the Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
