Cases 71 - 77 of 77
David Thomas v. United States District Court f
as 10-72409
:
In re: DAVID LEE THOMAS
Petitioner:
DAVID LEE THOMAS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, PORTLAND
Real Party In Interest:
STATE OF OREGON, OREGON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, OREGON JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT and others
Cavin v. State of Oregon Department of Justice Division of Child Support
as 6:2009cv06248
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Cavin
Defendant:
State of Oregon Department of Justice Division of Child Support
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bixby et al v. KBR, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00632
Plaintiff:
Rocky Bixby, Lawrence Roberta, Scott Ashby and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Oregon Department of Justice Crime Victim's Assistance Section
Defendant:
KBR, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Service, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Mary Jo Pullen-Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soho v. State of Oregon Department of Justice et al
as 1:2009cv03001
Plaintiff:
Sandra Soho
Defendant:
State of Oregon Department of Justice, Klamath County Circuit Court, Judge Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv06358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States of America v. The Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Successors in Interest and Claimants to the Estate of Lloyd E. Gray et al
as 6:2008cv00689
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
The Unknown Heirs, Devisees, Successors in Interest and Claimants to the Estate of Lloyd E. Gray, Catherine Clifford, Peak Financial Parteners, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Norland v. Oregon Department of Justice et al
as 3:2008cv00521
Petitioner:
Richard Norland
Respondent:
Oregon Department of Justice, Oregon State Bar, US DOJ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
