Cases 71 - 80 of 608
Hooker v. Harry et al
as 1:2019cv01352
Respondent:
Kenneth A Mummah, Emily Mezzner, Laurel Harry and others
Petitioner:
George J Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Helms v. Garman et al
as 5:2019cv03264
Respondent:
MARK GARMAN, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BERKS COUNTY
Petitioner:
Richard Helms, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart v. Tice et al
as 1:2019cv01294
Respondent:
Eric W Tice, PA Attorney General and District Attorney Dauphin County District Attorney
Petitioner:
Shawn A. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Riccardi v. Smith et al
as 1:2019cv01289
Petitioner:
Elvis Aaron Riccardi
Respondent:
Superintendent Barry Smith and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Helms v. Garman et al
as 1:2019cv01265
Respondent:
Mark Garman and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Richard Helms, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olivo-Noble v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2019cv01229
Respondent:
John E. Wetzel and PA Attorney General
Defendant:
Kevin Kauffaman
Petitioner:
Jose A. Olivo-Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al
as 4:2019cv01230
Petitioner:
Noel Brown
Respondent:
PA Attorney General and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00199
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL R. CLARK, ERIE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and PA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
DAVON DEANDRE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hoffman v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv01173
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, John E. Wetzel, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and others
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis v. Supt. SCI-Retreat et al
as 1:2019cv01158
Respondent:
Supt. SCI-Retreat and PA Attorney General
Petitioner:
Saward Davis and Sawud Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
