Cases 71 - 80 of 379
Austin Saenz v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02542
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Mr. Allen and others
Respondent:
Wright, --
Plaintiff:
Austin Saenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joaquin Lugo v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02457
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Lugo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Perez v. Ralph Diaz, et al.
as 5:2020cv02508
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Perez and Anthony Alfred Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Rubio v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02541
Respondent:
Kenneth J. Pogue, Rossolio, Messerli and others
Petitioner:
Ricardo Rubio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Carranza v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv02394
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Benny Carranza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorian Gutierrez v. Ralph Diaz, et al
as 20-56216
Defendant / Appellee:
P. BIRDSONG, ANTHONY CARTER, JEFF MACOMBER, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORIAN L. GUTIERREZ
Raul Perez v. Ralph Diaz et al
as 5:2020cv02509
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Ralph Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garcia v. Diaz
as 2:2020cv02337
Plaintiff:
Peter Garcia
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al
as 20-56108
Defendant / Appellee:
REGIS A. GUERIN, in his corporate and individual capacities, JPMORGAN CHASE CUSTODY SERVICES, INC., in its corporate capacity, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, in its corporate & municipal capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BARBARA SIKKING, LEON-QIYAM POGUE and JEFF SIKKING
(PC) Saenz v. Diaz et al
as 2:2020cv02042
Defendant:
Anthony Carter, Kenneth J. Pogue, Landry and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Saenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
