Cases 71 - 80 of 117
POOL v. CONTICO CORPORATION
as 2:2016cv03815
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POOL
Defendant:
CONTICO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
POOL v. CONTICO CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv03815
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POOL
Defendant:
CONTICO CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
POOL & SPA ENCLOSURES, LLC v. AQUA SHIELD, INC.
as 3:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
POOL & SPA ENCLOSURES, LLC
Defendant:
AQUA SHIELD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
WILMOTH et al v. GUADAGNO
as 3:2016cv01854
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILMOTH , TRENTON POOL , SIGNATURE MASTERS, INC. and others
Defendant:
KIM GUADAGNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GARRECOA v. INCA POOL CORP. et al
as 3:2016cv00311
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL GARRECOA
Defendant:
INCA POOL CORP. and ROMEG LIMA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
POOLE v. SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 1:2015cv05319
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL POOLE
Defendant:
SELECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
BLOOMFIELD MB IX, LLC v. NEW FRONTIERS MAPLE HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv07245
Plaintiff:
BLOOMFIELD MB IX, LLC
Defendant:
NEW FRONTIERS MAPLE HOLDINGS, LLC, 15 TALBOT STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC, 112 FOREST STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCORPIO ULTRAMAX POOL LTD. v. DALIAN SUNTIME INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CO., LIMITED
as 2:2014cv06179
Plaintiff:
SCORPIO ULTRAMAX POOL LTD.
Defendant:
DALIAN SUNTIME INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CO., LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al v. PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.
as 2:2014cv05101
Plaintiff:
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. and POOLVERGNUEGEN
Defendant:
PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. v. PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.
as 1:2014cv04721
Plaintiff:
HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
