Cases 71 - 80 of 234
Cecil v. Diaz
as 3:2019cv02404
Defendant:
Ralph M. Diaz
Plaintiff:
Gary Allen Cecil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Charles Allen v. J. Cardenas, et al
as 19-56419
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Secretary of CDCR, J. CARDENAS, Correctional Officer, M. POLLARD, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES EDWARD ALLEN
Ronald Robinson v. Ralph M. Diaz
as 2:2019cv09894
Petitioner:
Ronald Robinson, Ronald Eugene Robinson and Ronald Gene Robinson
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Casto v. Newsom et al
as 2:2019cv02312
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, Diana Toche, Harold Hold and others
Plaintiff:
Hershel Wayne Casto, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Martinez et al
as 3:2019cv02166
Defendant:
Bryaton + Ducell, Ray Thornton, Stacey L. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) J'Weial v. Newsom et al
as 2:2019cv02239
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, County of Amador, Ralph M. Diaz and others
Plaintiff:
Xavier Lumar J'Weial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salvador Duenas v. Ralph Diaz
as 2:2019cv09271
Respondent:
Ralph M Diaz
Petitioner:
Salvador Duenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hendrix Montecastro v. USDC-CAFR
as 19-72658
Not Classified By Court:
In re: HENDRIX MORENO MONTECASTRO
Not Yet Classified:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and GALVIN NEWSOME
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Petitioner:
HENDRIX MORENO MONTECASTRO
Jimmie Carter v. J. Castelo et al
as 2:2019cv08986
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Carter
Defendant:
Ralph M. Diaz, Ronalyn Amor Walker, Gary Masigman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-56104
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
