Cases 71 - 80 of 106
WASHINGTON v. CREWS et al
as 1:2014cv00105
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RAY WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SCOTT M CREWS, J SHULER, T DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorp v. JP Morgan Chase S/B/M Chase Home Finance, LLC S/B/M Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp
as 1:2014cv21189
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Thorp
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase S/B/M Chase Home Finance LLC S/B/M Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Chris Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Bethea et al v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2014cv60291
Petitioner:
James Bethea , Charles F. Forgar , Linda T. Belcher-Commisso and others
Respondent:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv24423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv62665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
WILLIS v. SHULER et al
as 4:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
JAMES W WILLIS
Defendant:
GARY H SHULER, JAMES H SHULER and PATSY ANN SHULER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Shuler v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2013cv20716
Plaintiff:
Margaret Shuler
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
