Cases 71 - 80 of 342
Wilson v. Warden of San Quentin State Prison et al
as 5:2020cv09475
Defendant:
Secretary of CDCR and Warden for San Quentin State Prison
Plaintiff:
Van Otis Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Beeler v. Ron Broomfield
as 20-99014
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Petitioner / Appellant:
RODNEY GENE BEELER
D'Arcy v. San Quentin State Prison
as 3:2020cv09398
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Daniel D'Arcy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron Willie Brigham v. Prison Law Offices San Quentin et al
as 5:2020cv02525
Plaintiff:
Aaron Willie Brigham
Defendant:
Prison Law Offices San Quentin and Sheriff Chad Bianco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chisenhall v. San Quentin State Prison
as 3:2020cv07980
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison
Plaintiff:
Kent David Chisenhall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett Spillard v. Hoffman, et al
as 20-17186
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUNG, RN; Nurse 4th Floor CTC San Quentin, A. NGUYEN, Dietitian San Quentin State Prison, RON DAVIS, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EVERETT SPILLARD
Edwards v. San Quentin State Prison et al
as 5:2020cv07567
Plaintiff:
Jahmal M. Edwards
Defendant:
Warden Ron Bloomfield, John Doe, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Smith v. Ronald Davis
as 20-17037
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD DAVIS, Warden, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Petitioner / Appellant:
TROY SMITH
Joseph Hart v. Ron Broomfield
as 20-99011
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentin
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM HART
Wright v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2020cv06374
Plaintiff:
Mario J Wright
Defendant:
San Quentin State Prison Warden at the Time of, Christine Saunders, Brook Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
