Cases 71 - 80 of 82
Schofield v. Krause et al
as 8:2013cv01993
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
Debra L. Krause and Donald Eslinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv01835
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Branch et al
as 3:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Erin Branch, Hazen Schofield, Sarah Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Schofield v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2012cv01652
Petitioner:
Preston Schofield
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SCHOFIELD v. FOSTER & COMPANY LLC
as 3:2012cv00420
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCHOFIELD
Defendant:
FOSTER & COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Schofield v. Schott
as 6:2012cv00896
Plaintiff:
Preston Schofield
Defendant:
Frederic Schott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield v. Sheriff Donald Eslinger
as 6:2012cv00526
Petitioner:
Preston Leonard Schofield
Defendant:
Sheriff Donald Eslinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv00377
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Health First Health Plans, Inc. v. Schofield
as 6:2009cv01169
Plaintiff:
Health First Health Plans, Inc. and Health First Health Plans, Inc.
Defendant:
William F. Schofield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
