Cases 71 - 80 of 2,342
Ricksy v. USA
as 1:2023cv00451
Petitioner:
Kevin D Ricksy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01893
Petitioner:
JOHN ALAN LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gould v. USA
as 2:2023cv00365
Petitioner:
Charles Gould
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hudson v. USA
as 1:2023cv00449
Petitioner:
Tyson Hudson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
McGhee v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
James E McGhee, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. USA
as 2:2023cv00338
Petitioner:
Bryant Love
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. USA
as 3:2023cv00884
Petitioner:
Kendrick Johnson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
KERSEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv01722
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM KERSEY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
UNGER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv01717
Plaintiff:
TERRIE UNGER and JAMES UNGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2672 pi Federal Tort Claims Act - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
