Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Ashley v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 0:2008cv00334
Plaintiff:
Richard R. Ashley
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Federal Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sweesy v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2008cv00323
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Michael Sweesy
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whitaker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2007cv04874
Petitioner:
Kevin Whitaker
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Toliver v. Fondren et al
as 0:2007cv04308
Petitioner:
Edward Toliver, Jr.
Respondent:
Dwight Fondren and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Portales v. US Attorney General et al
as 0:2007cv00164
Respondent:
US Attorney General, Agent Wardens and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Ramon Portales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sanchez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 0:2007cv03522
Petitioner:
Andres Sanchez, Jr.
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and Marty C Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2007cv01599
Petitioner:
Vernon Bonner
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Sanders et al
as 0:2007cv01457
Plaintiff:
Derrick Turner
Defendant:
David Sanders, Deanna Hiller, Michael Isaacson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tineo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2005cv00724
Plaintiff:
Jose Rafael Tineo
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Mayo Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
