Cases 71 - 80 of 1,443
SHENZHEN JISU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v. The Entities and Individuals Identified in Annex A
as 1:2024cv02948
Plaintiff:
SHENZHEN JISU TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
Defendant:
The Entities and Individuals Identified in Annex A, ZHOUTY, VHJWPDYD Drone and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 24-2221
Plaintiff:
MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nguyen v. Nguyen
as 3:2024cv02068
Plaintiff:
huynh xuan nguyen
Defendant:
Nguyen thanh tam thi and Tam Thi Thanh Nguyen doing business as Home Furniture Design Mfg.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Trinh v. Pan et al
as 4:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
Dr Windsen Pan and Dr Ashley Pan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trinh v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association et al
as 4:2024cv01230
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association, Glenn Walker, Mr. Kenneth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation
as 4:2024cv01231
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation, Ted Smith, Robert Hambleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Trinh v. CITGO Petroleum Corporation et al
as 4:2024mc00490
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
CITGO Petroleum Corporation and Daniel Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
