Cases 71 - 80 of 138
WATSON v. FARIS et al
as 1:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
RONALD EUGENE WATSON
Defendant:
MARK H. WITTSTADT, ERIC VANDEL LINDE, MICHAEL KOCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KENNEY v. SRT INC
as 1:2015cv00813
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. KENNEY
Defendant:
SRT TRUCKING INC, TONY SMITH, MICHAEL A. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
PATRICK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2014cv01687
Plaintiff:
TAMBU PATRICK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, RONALD MACHEN, TONY COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01608
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DIMONDSTEIN et al v. AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
as 1:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
MARK DIMONDSTEIN , TONY MCKINNON and VIOLETTA WARD
Defendant:
AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
KLAYMAN et al v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2013cv00881
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, KEITH B. ALEXANDER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN , MICHAEL FERRARI , CHARLES STRANGE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HARRISON v. MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00874
Defendant:
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC and MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC.
Plaintiff:
TONI HARRISON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DANIELS v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2013cv00785
Plaintiff:
JERMEL RASHOND DANIELS
Defendant:
TONY DAVIS, LONNIE SMITH, MICKEY BOLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
