Cases 71 - 80 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10750
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Mironchikova et al v. Keisler et al
as 1:2007cv11726
Plaintiff:
Tamara Mironchikova, Andrey Vladdimirovic Spichkin and Dmitriy Andreevich Spichkin
Defendant:
Peter D Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Eduardo Aguirre, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2007cv11001
Plaintiff:
Shaobo Chen
Defendant:
Emilio T. Gonzalez, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Gharbi v. Chertoff, et al
as 1:2007cv10818
Plaintiff:
Smail Gharbi and Smail Gharbi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Robert Cowan, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10810
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
