Cases 71 - 80 of 173
Flack v. Demarco
as 2:2012cv04354
Defendant:
Suffolk Cnty Sheriff Vincent F. Demarco
Plaintiff:
Irving A. Flack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cruz v. DeMarco et al
as 2:2012cv04277
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Cruz
Defendant:
Sheriff Vincent F. DeMarco, Suffolk County Correctional Facility, Suffolk County Correctional Facility Dental Staff and others
Hospital:
Peconic Bay Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gurrieri v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2012cv04252
Defendant:
Sheriff Vincent F. DeMarco, Huntington Hospital Association, John and Jane Does 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gurrieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. DeMarco et al
as 2:2012cv03948
Defendant:
Vincent F. DeMarco and Charles Ewald
Plaintiff:
Julian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClinton v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2012cv03949
Defendant:
Sergeant Davis, Sheriff Vincent F. DeMarco, Correctional Officer Forie and others
Plaintiff:
Charles McClinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Demarco
as 2:2012cv03624
Defendant:
Suffolk Cnty Sheriff Vincent F. Demarco
Plaintiff:
Malachi McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. DeMarco et al
as 2:2012cv02873
Defendant:
Vincent F. DeMarco and Charles Ewald
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hernandez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Demarco
as 2:2012cv02793
Defendant:
Vincent F. Demarco
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Demarco
as 2:2012cv02794
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brooks
Defendant:
Vincent F. Demarco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. DeMarco et al
as 2:2012cv02714
Plaintiff:
Luther Booker, Jr.
Defendant:
Vincent F. DeMarco and Charles Ewald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
