Cases 71 - 80 of 203
SMITH v. MANHEIM AUTOMOTIVE DEALER SERVICES INC et al
as 1:2016mc01926
Plaintiff:
TOHMAI SMITH
Defendant:
MANHEIM AUTOMOTIVE DEALER SERVICES INC, KATHERINE DECKER, SANFORD H. SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
FONTROY v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv01741
Plaintiff:
WALTER FONTROY
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and FREDERICK ONOJA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ et al v. DMY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01397
Plaintiff:
OSCAR ANTONIO GOMEZ , MARTIN E. VARGAS , JOSE LUIS RAMOS ALEGRIA and others
Defendant:
DMY ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, LLC and WEIYI MA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
HINES v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00795
Plaintiff:
WALTER HINES
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HAMMOND v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2016cv00421
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , DEFENSE HEALTH AGENCY and WALTER REED NATIONAL MILITARY MEDICAL CENTER
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HAMMOND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HOLLIS et al v. STEEPLES et al
as 1:2015cv02180
Plaintiff:
WALTER LEE HOLLIS and WALTER LEE HOLLIS, JR.
Defendant:
CODY STEEPLES, JEREMY WELCH, CARI DIEU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MITCHELL v. JACKS et al
as 1:2015cv01990
Plaintiff:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
IMAN JACKS, LASHEEKA R. DIXON, ALFRED L. HAYES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BANKS v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 99
as 1:2015cv01598
Plaintiff:
WALTER IRVING BANKS
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 99 , MICHAEL MURPHY , MARK SEXTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
