Cases 71 - 80 of 169
Augst et al v. Medtronic, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Thomas Augst , Jody Bauer , Amanda Ayres and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McAdams et al v. Federal Knitting Mills Bldg. Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv00559
Plaintiff:
Sandy McAdams , Gregg Simmons and Fair Housing Advocates Assoc.
Defendant:
Federal Knitting Mills Bldg. Ltd., CLV-Lofts, L.L.C. and Doug Perkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00201
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00168
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Simmons v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20226
Plaintiff:
Hattie Simmons
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. USA Bus Company et al
as 4:2016cv02837
Plaintiff:
Alvin R. Simmons, Jr
Defendant:
USA Bus Company and Donna M. Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Heard et al v. Nielson et al
as 1:2016cv01002
Plaintiff:
Keith D Heard , Eric B Barnett , Stephen L Evans and others
Defendant:
Martin Nielson, Susan Johnson and Paul Haft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simmons v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2016dp20153
Plaintiff:
Timothy Simmons
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. N.E.O.C.C. Medical Department et al
as 4:2016cv01932
Plaintiff:
Alvin Simmons
Defendant:
N.E.O.C.C. Medical Department, Ruplka, Counseler Ms. Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
