Cases 71 - 80 of 106
Chung v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
Chen I. Chung
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
CHEN et al v. HANGZHOU HOLIN PLASTIC MACHINERY CO., LTD et al
as 5:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
BOA TING CHEN and SHEN YUN PAN
Defendant:
HANGZHOU HOLIN PLASTIC MACHINERY CO., LTD, UPG FORT JAMES INVESTMENT LP, UPG REALTY INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GREEN LAND TEA HOUSE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv06071
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GREEN LAND TEA HOUSE, LLC, KAM PO JUNG and WEN YAN CHEN
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0601 -0695 Federal Meat Inspection Act (\"the Act\")
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Chen v. Holt et al
as 3:2012cv01817
Plaintiff:
Whitey-Tamatumua Chen
Defendant:
Ronnie Holt, Ryan and Durkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HET-JV et al v. JOHN DOES 1-5
as 2:2012cv02640
Plaintiff:
HET-JV , HUNG-YI CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD. , TA CHEN CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CHEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01746
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Plaintiff:
SUZANNE CHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chung v. Ebbert
as 3:2012cv00489
Petitioner:
Chen I Chung
Respondent:
David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LAHOOD v. DOUBLE HAPPYNESS TRAVEL, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv00304
Plaintiff:
RAY LAHOOD
Defendant:
DOUBLE HAPPYNESS TRAVEL, INC., LUN BING CHEN and LINDA CHEN
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 3102
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
