Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Morgan v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv01361
Plaintiff:
Lloyd George Morgan, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian K. Murphy, Mark W. Strange, James E. Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Perry v. Social Security Admin
as 3:2008cv01044
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Perry
Defendant:
Social Security Admin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Perry v. Social Security Admin
as 3:2008cv01044
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Perry
Defendant:
Social Security Admin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Doll et al v. Champion Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00718
Plaintiff:
Francis Doll, III, Piper Perry, John Foster and others
Defendant:
Champion Laboratories, Inc., Champion Laboratories, Inc., United Components Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hale v. Great Oak Capital LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00514
Plaintiff:
Perry Hale
Defendant:
Great Oak Capital LLC and Bradley E. Sinrod
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Irving v. Lantz et al
as 3:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Adrien Irving
Defendant:
Brian Murphy, Charles Lee, Jeff Adgers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Merck & Co Inc
as 3:2007cv01701
Plaintiff:
Jennie C. Perry
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Chaney v. United States District Court et al
as 3:2007cv01641
Plaintiff:
Carla D. Chaney, Melvin L. Perry, Keith Chaney and others
Defendant:
United States District Court, Stefan R. Underhill, State of Connecticut and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
