Cases 71 - 80 of 40,910
KRAVTIN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00661
Petitioner:
BENSON KRAVTIN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
VECCHIATO v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00667
Petitioner:
JACOPO VECCHIATO
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
MCCORKLE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00669
Petitioner:
JENNIFER MCCORKLE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RANIERI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00659
Petitioner:
KAREN RANIERI
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SNIPE ISLAND FOREST CO., LLC et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
SNIPE ISLAND FOREST CO., LLC and MT ASSOCIATES, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
GRUBE et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
D.M.D. BLANCHE DURAND GRUBE and REVEREND JUAN-JOSE: BROOKINS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv00358
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
In re: Cahill
as 24-1745
Appellant:
In re: BRET EDWARD CAHILL
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Jindal Poly Films Limited v. United States
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jindal Poly Films Limited
Defendant:
United States
Intervenor:
DuPont Teijin Films, SK Microworks America, Inc. and Mitsubishi Chemical America, Inc. - Polyester Film Division
Townsend v. HHS
as 24-1740
Petitioner:
WILBERT L. TOWNSEND, SR.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
