Cases 71 - 80 of 4,294
Murratti v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
as 3:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Steven Murratti
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Jones v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Espen Jones
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ressler v. USA
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Peter Ressler
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GEICO v. Aparicio et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
GEICO
Defendant:
Michael Aparicio, Maddox, Inc. and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Rodriguez v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Keishla Rodriguez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Gelband v. Walmart, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Sasha Gelband
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeAngelis et al v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2023cv01609
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey DeAngelis and Mary Ann Bowen-DeAngelis
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Karatzas v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv01627
Plaintiff:
Tina Karatzas
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership, Wal-Mart Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hanlon v. Delk et al
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Amanda R. Hanlon
Defendant:
Tyler D. Delk, Jason W. Rinsky and Sacred Heart University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Porta v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Porta
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc., Exactech U.S., Inc., TPG, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
