Cases 71 - 80 of 12,473
Fletcher v. Redman et al
as 3:2024cv05216
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
Jennifer Redman, Yvonne Umu and Shawn Northcut
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Soderberg v. Spokane County Jail Instatution Jail Staff et al
as 2:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Martie Marie Soderberg
Defendant:
Spokane County Jail Instatution Jail Staff, Sheriffs Dept, Sgt Burrto's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holland v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00370
Petitioner:
Demeko Brazille Holland
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Felder v. Ahern
as 2:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lumpkin v. Seattle Municipal Court et al
as 2:2024cv00350
Plaintiff:
Robert Lumpkin
Defendant:
Seattle Municipal Court and King County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Jackson
as 2:2024cv00354
Petitioner:
Kevion Maurice Alexander
Respondent:
Rob Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fletcher v. Hurt et al
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
John Hurt and Phillip Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Hurt et al
as 2:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Defendant:
John Hurt and L Barns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
