Cases 81 - 90 of 1,854
Rowe v. Judge Cristy Criag et al
as 2:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Michael Rowe
Defendant:
Judge Cristy Criag, Judge Natali Woods, Judge Jeannie Hua and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 2:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Shane Donavan Brooks
Defendant:
Roman, Weiland, Guzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terezo v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2023cv01577
Plaintiff:
David Terezo
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Booker v. Williams
as 2:2023cv01566
Petitioner:
David Booker
Respondent:
Brian Williams and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lackey v. Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01562
Plaintiff:
David Lackey
Defendant:
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Palmer v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00479
Plaintiff:
Markiece Palmer
Defendant:
Tim Garrett, David Rivas, Erin Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pircio v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2023cv01550
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PIRCIO
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Interested Party:
David Terezo
Lackey v. MGM Resorts International
as 2:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
David Lackey
Defendant:
MGM Resorts International
Interested Party:
David Terezo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gillham v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv01543
Plaintiff:
David Grant Gillham
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Zussman v. VICI Properties 1 LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
David Zussman
Defendant:
VICI Properties 1 LLC, Vici Properties 2 L. P., MGM Growth Properties Operating Partnership, LP and others
Interested Party:
David Terezo
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
