Cases 81 - 90 of 284
De La Cruz v. Johns et al
as 5:2020cv00037
Respondent:
United States Of America and Tracy Johns
Petitioner:
Ilcias Perez De La Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Knox et al v. American Professional Associates, LLC
as 1:2019cv04890
Plaintiff:
Mrugesh Patel, David Quarin, Daryl B. Knox and others
Defendant:
American Professional Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lazaro v. Georgia Diversified Services, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00214
Defendant:
Georgia Diversified Services, LLC and Mario Perez
Plaintiff:
Christian Lazaro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00164
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States of America v. 404 Folsom Glade Road, Rydal, Georgia 30171 et al
as 4:2019mi00003
Defendant:
404 Folsom Glade Road, Rydal, Georgia 30171
Claimant:
Juan Antonio Perez
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Momon v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03167
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and Bank of New York Mellon
Plaintiff:
Perez Momon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Posadas v. United States Of America
as 2:2019cv00041
Petitioner:
Miguel Perez Posadas
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Perez et al v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv02677
Plaintiff:
Mike Perez and Amy E. Perez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
