Cases 81 - 90 of 120
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2017cv06611
Plaintiff:
Holly Schuetz
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK, a District of Columbia corporation
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Hanes v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, The
as 1:2017cv05634
Plaintiff:
Jeff Hanes
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a/ Amtrak and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a Metra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02457
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pruitt v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2017cv01267
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darryl Pruitt
Defendant:
Amtrak and Union Station Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
Chad Robertson
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corp. and As-Yet Unknown Amtrak Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters v. Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2016cv10624
Plaintiff:
Larry S Walters
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bond v. Chicago Union Station Company et al
as 1:2016cv09878
Plaintiff:
Brandy Bond
Defendant:
Chicago Union Station Company, Amtrak Police station, City Of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv08764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haney v. Amtrak et al
as 1:2016cv05904
Plaintiff:
Krishna Haney
Defendant:
Amtrak , National Railroad Passenger Corporation , University Of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
