Cases 81 - 90 of 797
Sprowson Jr v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00170
Defendant:
Baker
Plaintiff:
Sprowson Jr
Petitioner:
Melvyn Perry Sprowson Jr
Respondent:
Rene Baker, Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Langford v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
Justin Odell Langford
Defendant:
Mrs. Bequette, H. Wickham, James Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enriquez v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2020cv00093
Defendant:
Nevada, State of and Renee Baker
Plaintiff:
Antonio Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blixseth v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 2:2020cv00265
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, John Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Blixseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Blixseth v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, John Morton and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy L. Blixseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Marquez v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00073
Petitioner:
Johnny A. Marquez
Respondent:
Nevada Attorney General and Renee Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cross v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00042
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Renee Baker
Petitioner:
James Edward Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pamplin v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Healer, Oxborrow, Dzurenda and others
Plaintiff:
John David Pamplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langford v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Renee Baker, James Dzurenda, Lovelock Law Library Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. OMD et al
as 3:2019cv00772
Defendant:
Jennifer Nash, FCRRO, Tara Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Lausteveion Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
