Cases 81 - 90 of 339
BATES v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, LUCINDA GAILEY and BARRY SMITH
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
QUEER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00223
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
DONALD W. QUEER
Defendant:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF WESTMORELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCCAMEY v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00192
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MERCER COUNTY
Petitioner:
PATRICK SHAWN MCCAMEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JOHNSON v. SMITH
as 2:2021cv00650
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH
Petitioner:
WAYNE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TEPPER v. SMITH et al
as 2:2021cv00387
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
FRANK TEPPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Polanco-Cano v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00096
Respondent:
Barry Smith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
Israel Polanco-Cano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DUQUE v. SMITH et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Respondent:
BARRY SMITH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
JOSE DUQUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reid v. Smith et al
as 3:2021cv00097
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe #1-1, Unit Counselor McBride, T. Millard and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Michael Reid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BUNDY v. SMITH et al
as 3:2021cv00004
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL and BARRY SMITH
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUNDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SHELTON v. SMITH et al
as 2:2020cv02018
Petitioner:
DALE SHELTON
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and BARRY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
