Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Handler v. Sapphire Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv02902
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Handler
Defendant:
Sapphire Group, Inc., Robert G. Tardiff, Richard P. Hubner and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Luri v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
as 1:2009cv01664
Plaintiff:
Ronald Luri
Defendant:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Republic Services, Inc., Republic Services of Ohio Hauling, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bowen et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Richard Bowen, Harry Rick Bowen and Geralyn Marie Bowen
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
New NV Co. LLC v. Wickham et al
as 3:2008cv02499
Plaintiff:
New NV Co LLC and New NV Co LLC
Defendant:
Brian Wickham, Wick's Construction Company, Inc., Bradley Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKeddie v. Bowen et al
as 3:2007cv03571
Plaintiff:
Brian C McKeddie
Defendant:
William L. Bowen and Marten Transport, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bowen v. McKinney et al
as 1:2007cv00942
Plaintiff:
Herman S. Bowen and Herman S. Bowen
Defendant:
McKinney, William Mercer, Village of New Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Loeffler et al v. Fortis, Inc., et al
as 3:2007cv02811
Plaintiff:
Bowen Loeffler and Juliane Loeffler
Defendant:
Fortis, Inc., Fortis, Inc. and Ryan Karlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
