Cases 81 - 90 of 334
Chester Duda v. D. Neven, et al
as 18-16318
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHESTER DUDA
Respondent - Appellee:
D. NEVEN, BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
McCallister v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv01140
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian E Williams
Petitioner:
Donald McCallister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Araujo v. Williams
as 2:2018cv00968
Petitioner:
Ignacio Araujo
Respondent:
Brian E. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv00940
Defendant:
Romeo Asanas, James Dzurenda, A Manalang and others
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Williams et al
as 2:2018cv00799
Defendant:
James E. Dzurenda, Arthur Emling, Jr., Myra Laurian and others
Plaintiff:
Sonjia Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gibson v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2018cv00190
Defendant:
Sergeant Biazono, James Dzurenda, C/O Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Craig Otis Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Hendren v. Brian Williams, et al
as 18-15642
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH A. HENDREN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JO GENTRY, Warden
Echols v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00130
Defendant:
G. Bryan, Judge Leavitt, Associate Warden Jennifer Nash and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Echols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Williams v. Williams et al
as 3:2018cv00116
Respondent:
Nancy Flores, Jo Gentry, Nevada Attorney General and others
Petitioner:
Timothy Leroy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2018cv00428
Defendant:
Romeo Aranus, M Cervas, M. Dante and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
