Cases 81 - 88 of 88
MCDANIEL v. LANIER
as 1:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
RONNIE LEE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
CATHY L. LANIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILLIPS v. LANIER, et al
as 1:2008cv01877
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
CATHY L. LANIER and EIGHT UNKNOWN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. LANIER et al
as 1:2008cv00808
Plaintiff:
LEOLA SMITH, LEOLA SMITH and LEOLA SMITH
Defendant:
CATHY L. LANIER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THOMAS ELLINGSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ANDREEN v. LANIER et al
as 1:2008cv00810
Plaintiff:
JULIANN ANDREEN, JULIANN ANDREEN and JULIANN ANDREEN
Defendant:
CATHY L. LANIER, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, JUSTIN LINVILLE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HUNTER v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2008cv00303
Plaintiff:
EUGENE HUNTER
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT, CATHY L. LANIER, WILLIAM SUTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeffrey Barham v. Kenneth Salazar
as 07-5305
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Jeffrey Barham, Mary Canales, William Durham and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary, Department of Interior, Kenneth Lee Salazar, Secretary, Department of Interior, Michael B. Mukasey, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles H. Ramsey, in his individual and personal capacity only, Cathy L. Lanier, District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Chief, in her official capacity, District of Columbia and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MPD Reserve Officers v. Cathy Lanier
as 07-7072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MPD Reserve Officers, Christopher Griffith and Daniel K. Kim
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles H. Ramsey and Cathy L. Lanier
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
