Cases 81 - 90 of 534
Duty et al v. Kentucky Hospital, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Molly Duty, Erica Duty and Jason Duty
Defendant:
Kentucky Hospital, LLC doing business as Clark Regional Medical Center, MD John F. Greene, III, Associates for Women's Care, PSC and others
Petitioner:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Smith v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Mikell Williams
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milam v. Clark et al
as 6:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Harold Michael Milam
Defendant:
Danny Clark and John and/or Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Kameron Butler
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Joshua Page
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: The Estate of Brian Keith Bennett et al v. Gomez et al
as 6:2022cv00045
In Re:
The Estate of Brian Keith Bennett
Executor:
Wanda Ellen Bennett and Michael Keith Bennett
Defendant:
Warden C. Gomez, John or Jane Doe, John or Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Shepard v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00133
Plaintiff:
Majustic Shepard
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. Clark
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Isaiah McCoy
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace et al v. Louisville Metro Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Erik Michael Wallace, Montez Lamont Barker and Dallas Murphy-Johnson
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Department of Corrections, P. Gardner, Sgt. J. Muddler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
