Cases 81 - 90 of 199
Drones v. Medical Security Officials et al
as 1:2018cv00066
Petitioner:
Jesse Lee Drones
Respondent:
Medical Security Officials, FNU LNU, Classification and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Minnfee v. Gutierrez et al
as 1:2018cv00220
Defendant:
Julie Alexander, American Correctional Association, Classification T.T. and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Dwayne Minnfee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dibrell v. cano et al
as 1:2018cv00060
Respondent:
Major FNU Cano and Unit Classification Committee Members
Petitioner:
Erwin Dibrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kidd v. Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2018cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlos Kidd
Defendant:
Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Chairman Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Director TDCJ - CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sephus v. Collier et al
as 4:2017cv03864
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Ray Sephus
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Inmate Prison Records & Classification, Texas Department Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Amarillo Classification Bill Clements Unit
as 3:2017cv03455
Petitioner:
Fred A Dixon, Jr
Respondent:
Amarillo Classification Bill Clements Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Tompkins et al
as 1:2017cv00504
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward Byrd, III
Defendant:
Aaron Tompkins, Lynne Sharp, Tawn Roddey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindsey v. Sarhani et al
as 7:2017cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kemuel Lindsey
Defendant:
M Sarhani, Brian Jones, David Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thunderhorse v. Collier et al
as 9:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
Iron Thunderhorse
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis, Lannette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Clark et al
as 2:2017cv00221
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker
Defendant:
Jason Clark, Joshua Carrillo, Terry Raines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
